Transaction support in WAS
Support for transactions is provided by the transaction service within WebSphere Application Server. The way that applications use transactions depends on the type of application component.
A transaction is unit of activity, within which multiple updates to resources can be made atomic (as an indivisible unit of work) such that all or none of the updates are made permanent. For example, during the processing of an SQL COMMIT statement, the database manager atomically commits multiple SQL statements to a relational database. In this case, the transaction is contained entirely within the database manager and can be thought of as a resource manager local transaction (RMLT). In some contexts, a transaction is referred to as a logical unit of work (LUW). If a transaction involves multiple resource managers, for example multiple database managers, an external transaction manager is required to coordinate the individual resource managers. A transaction that spans multiple resource managers is referred to as a global transaction. WAS is a transaction manager that can coordinate global transactions, can be a participant in a received global transaction, and can also provide an environment in which resource manager local transactions can run.
The way that applications use transactions depends on the type of application component, as follows:
- A session bean can use either container-managed transactions (where the bean delegates management of transactions to the container) or bean-managed transactions (component-managed transactions where the bean manages transactions itself).
- Entity beans use container-managed transactions.
- Web components (servlets) and application client components use component-managed transactions.
WAS is a transaction manager that supports the coordination of resource managers through their XAResource interface, and participates in distributed global transactions with transaction managers that support the CORBA Object Transaction Service (OTS) protocol or Web Service Atomic Transaction (WS-AtomicTransaction) protocol. WAS also participates in transactions imported through Java EE Connector 1.5 resource adapters. We can also configure WebSphere applications to interact with databases, JMS queues, and JCA connectors through their local transaction support, when we do not require distributed transaction coordination.
(ZOS) In addition to supporting the coordination of XAResource-based resource managers, WAS for z/OS supports the coordination of resource managers through RRS (z/OS resource recovery services). RRS-compliant resource managers include DB2, IBM MQ, IMS, and CICS . IBM WAS for z/OS can coordinate a mix of RRSTransactional resource managers and XA capable resource managers under the same global transaction.
(ZOS) Resource managers that offer transaction support can be categorized into those that support two-phase coordination (by offering an XAResource interface or by supporting RRS) and those that support only one-phase coordination (for example through a LocalTransaction interface). The WAS transaction support provides coordination, within a transaction, for any number of two-phase capable resource managers. It also enables a single one-phase capable resource manager to be used within a transaction in the absence of any other resource managers, although a WebSphere transaction is not necessary in this case.
Resource managers that offer transaction support can be categorized into those that support two-phase coordination (by offering an XAResource interface) and those that support only one-phase coordination (for example through a LocalTransaction interface). The WAS transaction support provides coordination, within a transaction, for any number of two-phase capable resource managers. It also enables a single one-phase capable resource manager to be used within a transaction in the absence of any other resource managers, although a WebSphere transaction is not necessary in this case.
Under normal circumstances, we cannot mix one-phase commit capable resources and two-phase commit capable resources in the same global transaction, because one-phase commit resources cannot support the prepare phase of two-phase commit. There are some special circumstances where it is possible to include mixed-capability resources in the same global transaction:
- In scenarios where there is only a single one-phase commit resource provider that participates in the transaction and where all the two-phase commit resource-providers that participate in the transaction are used in a read-only fashion. In this case, the two-phase commit resources all vote read-only during the prepare phase of two-phase commit. Because the one-phase commit resource provider is the only provider to complete any updates, the one-phase commit resource does not have to be prepared.
- In scenarios where there is only a single one-phase commit resource provider that participates in the transaction with one or more two-phase commit resource providers and where last participant support is enabled. Last participant support enables the use of a single one-phase commit capable resource with any number of two-phase commit capable resources in the same global transaction.
The ActivitySession service provides an alternative unit-of-work (UOW) scope to that provided by global transaction contexts. It is a distributed context used to coordinate multiple one-phase resource managers. The WebSphere EJB container and deployment tooling support ActivitySessions as an extension to the Java EE programming model. Enterprise beans can be deployed with lifecycles influenced by ActivitySession context, as an alternative to transaction context. An application can then interact with a resource manager for the period of a client-scoped ActivitySession, rather than only the duration of an EJB method, and have the resource manager local transaction outcome directed by the ActivitySession.
(ZOS) Use transaction classes to classify client workload for workload management. The workload is different WebSphere transactions targeted to separate servant regions, each with goals defined by appropriate service classes. Each transaction is dispatched in its own WLM enclave in a servant region process, and is managed according to the goals of its service class. The server controller, which workload management views as a queue manager, uses the enclave associated with a client request to manage the priority of the work. If the work has a high priority, workload management can direct the work to a high-priority servant in the server. If the work has a low priority, workload management can direct the work to a low-priority servant. The effect is to partition the work according to priority within the same server.
Subtopics
- Resource manager local transaction (RMLT)
- Global transactions
- Local transaction containment
- Local and global transactions
- Client support for transactions
- Commit priority for transactional resources
- Sharing locks between transaction branches
- Transactional high availability
- Transaction compensation and business activity support
- JTA support
Related:
(ZOS) Resource Recovery Services (RRS) Coordination of access to one-phase commit and two-phase commit capable resources in the same transaction The ActivitySession service Transaction troubleshooting tips The Java transaction service (JTS) The Java transaction API (JTA) Web Service Atomic Transactions (WS-AtomicTransactions) specification Java EE Connector Architecture CORBA Object Transaction Service (OTS)