Network Deployment (Distributed operating systems), v8.0 > Applications > Data access resources > Data concepts > Connection management architecture

Unshareable and shareable connections

WAS v8 supports both unshareable and shareable connections. An unshareable connection is not shared with other components in the application. The component using this connection has full control of this connection.

Access to a resource marked as unshareable means that there is a one-to-one relationship between the connection handle a component is using and the physical connection with which the handle is associated. This access implies that every call to the getConnection method returns a connection handle solely for the requesting user. Typically, choose unshareable if you might do things to the connection that could result in unexpected behavior occurring in another application that is sharing the connection (for example, unexpectedly changing the isolation level).

Mark a resource as shareable allows for greater scalability. Instead of retrieving a new physical connection from the connection pool for every getConnection() invocation, the physical connection (that is, managed connection) is shared through multiple connection handles, as long as each getConnection request has the same connection properties. However, sharing a connection means that each user must not do anything to the connection that could change its behavior and disrupt a sharing partner (for example, changing the isolation level). The user also cannot code an application that assumes sharing to take place because it is up to the run time to decide whether or not to share a particular connection.

Connection property requirements

To permit sharing of connections used within the same transaction, the following data source properties must be the same:

• JNDI name. While not actually a connection property, this requirement simply means that you can only share connections from the same data source in the same server.
• Resource authentication

• In relational databases:
  • Isolation level (corresponds to access intent policies applied to CMP beans)
  • Readonly
  • Catalog
  • TypeMap

For more information on sharing a connection with a CMP bean, see the topic Sharing a connection with a CMP bean.

To permit sharing of connections within the same transaction, the following properties must be the same for the connection factories:

• JNDI name. While not actually a connection property, this requirement simply means that you can only share connections from the same connection factory in the same server.
• Resource authentication

In addition, the ConnectionSpec object used to get the connection must also be the same.

JMS connections cannot be shared with non-JMS connections.

JMS connections for the WebSphere MQ JMS Provider cannot be shareable because they are non-transactional, and the Java™ EE Connector Architecture (JCA) specification only allows transactional resources to be shareable. If the res-sharing-scope is set to shareable in a JMS resource reference, the setting will be ignored and unshareable connections will be used. However, JMS sessions for MQ are transactional, and can be shareable. JMS sessions are shareable by default, and APAR PK59605 provides the ability to specify unshareable sessions.

JMS connections for the Default Messaging Provider are different. With the Default Messaging Provider, connections can be shareable. Sessions, on the other hand, are not managed by a connection pool, and therefore cannot be shareable or unshareable.

Sharing a connection with a CMP bean

The application server allows you to share a physical connection among a CMP bean, a BMP bean, and a JDBC application to reduce the resource allocation or deadlock scenarios. There are several ways to ensure that all of these entity beans and the JDBC applications are sharing the same physical connection.

• Sharing a connection between CMP beans or methods

  When all CMP bean methods use the same access intent, they all share the same physical connection. A different access intent policy triggers the allocation of a different physical connection. For example, a CMP bean has two methods; method 1 is associated with wsPessimisticUpdate intent, whereas method 2 has wsOptimisticUpdate access intent. Method 1 and method 2 cannot share the same physical connection within a transaction. In other words, an XA data source is required to run in a global transaction.

  We can experience some deadlocks from a database if both methods try to access the same table. Therefore, sharing a connection is determined by the access intents that are defined in the CMP methods.

• Sharing a connection between CMP and BMP beans

  Remember to first verify that the getConnection methods of both the BMP bean and the CMP bean set the same connection properties.

  To match the authentication type of the CMP bean resource, set the authentication type of the BMP bean resource to container-managed, which is designated in the deployment descriptor as res-auth = Container.

  Additionally, use one of the following options to ensure connection-sharing between the bean types:

  • Define the same access intent on both CMP and BMP bean methods. Because both use the same access intent, they share the same physical connection. The advantage to using this option is that the backend is transparent to a BMP bean. However, this option also makes the BMP non-portable because it uses the WebSphere extended API to handle the isolation level. For more information, refer to the code example in the topic, Example: Accessing data using IBM extended APIs to share connections between container-managed and bean-managed persistence beans.
  • Determine the isolation level that the access intent uses on a CMP bean method, then use the corresponding isolation level specified on the resource reference to look up a data source and a connection. This option is more of a manual process, and the isolation level might be different from database to database. For more information refer to the isolation level and access intent mapping table in the topic, Access intent isolation levels and update locks, and the topic, Isolation level and resource reference section.

• Sharing a connection between CMP and a JDBC application used by a servlet or a session beanDetermine the isolation level that the access intent uses on a CMP bean method, then use the corresponding isolation level specified on the resource reference to look up a data source and a connection. For more information see the topic, Access intent isolation levels, and the topic, Isolation level and resource reference section.

Factors that determine sharing

The listing here is not an exhaustive one. The product might or might not share connections under different circumstances.

• Only connections acquired with the same resource reference (resource-ref) that specifies the res-sharing-scope as shareable are candidates for sharing. The resource reference properties of res-sharing-scope and res-auth and the IBM extension isolationLevel help determine if it is possible to share a connection. IBM extension isolationLevel is stored in IBM deployment descriptor extension file; for example: ibm-ejb-jar-ext.xmi.

  Supported configurations: For IBM extension and binding files, the .xmi or .xml file name extension is different depending on whether you are using a pre-Java EE 5 application or module or a Java EE 5 or later application or module. An IBM extension or binding file is named ibm-*-ext.xmi or ibm-*-bnd.xmi where * is the type of extension or binding file such as app, application, ejb-jar, or web. The following conditions apply:

  • For an application or module that uses a Java EE version prior to version 5, the file extension must be .xmi.

  • For an application or module that uses Java EE 5 or later, the file extension must be .xml. If .xmi files are included with the application or module, the product ignores the .xmi files.

  However, a Java EE 5 or later module can exist within an application that includes pre-Java EE 5 files and uses the .xmi file name extension.

  The ibm-webservices-ext.xmi, ibm-webservices-bnd.xmi, ibm-webservicesclient-bnd.xmi, ibm-webservicesclient-ext.xmi, and ibm-portlet-ext.xmi files continue to use the .xmi file extensions.

• We can only share connections that are requested with the same properties.
• Connection sharing only occurs between different component instances if they are within a transaction (container- or user-initiated transaction).
• Connection sharing only occurs within a sharing boundary. Current sharing boundaries include Transactions and LocalTransactionContainment (LTC) boundaries.
• Connection sharing rules within an LTC Scope:

  • For shareable connections, only Connection Reuse is allowed within a single component instance. Connection reuse occurs when the following actions are taken with a connection: get, use, commit/rollback, close; get, use, commit/rollback, close. Note that if you use the LTC resolution-control of ContainerAtBoundary then no start/commit is needed because that action is handled by the container.

    The connection returned on the second get is the same connection as that returned on the first get (if the same properties are used). Because the connection use is serial, only one connection handle to the underlying physical connection is used at a time, so true connection sharing does not take place. The term "reuse" is more accurate.

    More importantly, the LocalTransactionContainment boundary enclosing both get actions is not complete; no cleanUp() method is invoked on the ManagedConnection object. Therefore the second get action inherits all of the connection properties set during the first getConnection() call.

• Shareable connections between transactions (either container-managed transactions (CMT), bean-managed transactions (BMT), or LTC transactions) follow these caching rules:

  • In general, setting properties on shareable connections is not allowed because a user of one connection handle might not anticipate a change made by another connection handle. This limitation is part of the Java EE standard.
  • General users of resource adapters can set the connection properties on the connection factory getConnection() call by passing them in a ConnectionSpec.

    However, the properties set on the connection during one transaction are not guaranteed to be the same when used in the next transaction. Because it is not valid to share connections outside of a sharing scope, connection handles are moved off of the physical connection with which they are currently associated when a transaction ends. That physical connection is returned to the free connection pool. Connections are cleaned before going in the free pool. The next time the handle is used, it is automatically associated with an appropriate connection. The appropriateness is based on the security login information, connection properties, and (for the JDBC API) the isolation level specified in the extended resource reference, passed in on the original request that returned the current handle. Any properties set on the connection after it was retrieved are lost.

  • For JDBC users, the application server provides an extension to enable passing the connection properties through the ConnectionSpec.

    Use caution when setting properties and sharing connections in a local transaction scope. Ensure that other components with which the connection is shared are expecting the behavior resulting from your settings.

• We cannot set the isolation level on a shareable connection for the JDBC API using a relational resource adapter in a global transaction. The product provides an extension to the resource reference to enable you to specify the isolation level. If the application requires the use of multiple isolation levels, create multiple resource references and map them to the same data source or connection factory.

Maximal connection sharing

To maximize connection sharing opportunities for an application, ensure that each component has the local transaction containment (LTC) Resolver attribute set to ContainerAtBoundary. This setting specifies that the component container, rather than the application code, resolves all resource manager local transactions (RMLTs) within the LTC scope. The container begins an RMLT when a connection is first used within the LTC scope, and completes it automatically at the end of the LTC scope.

See the topic, Configuring transactional deployment attributes, for instructions on setting the transaction resolution control and other attributes.

Connection sharing violations

There is a new exception, the sharing violation exception, that the resource adapter can issue whenever an operation violates sharing requirements. Possible violations include changing connection attributes, security settings, or isolation levels, among others. When such a mutable operation is performed against a managed connection, the sharing violation exception can occur when both of the following conditions are true:

• The number of connection handles associated with the managed connection is more than one.
• The managed connection is associated with a transaction, either local or XA.

Both the component and the J2C run time might need to detect this sharing violation exception, depending on when and how the managed connection becomes unshareable. If the managed connection becomes unshareable because of an operation through the connection handle (for example, you change the isolation level), then the component needs to process the exception. If the managed connection becomes unshareable without being recognized by the application server (due to some component interaction with the connection handle), then the resource adapter can reject the creation of a connection handle by issuing the sharing violation exception.
Relational resource adapters and JCA
Data sources
Connection pooling
Connection handles
Requirements for setting data access isolation levels
Configure transactional deployment attributes
Use the transaction service

Related

Extensions to data access APIs
Connection considerations when migrating servlets, JSP, or enterprise session beans
Access intent service
Access intent policies for EJB 2.x entity beans Concept topic

+

Search Tips   |   Advanced Search