Security components troubleshooting tips


 

+

Search Tips   |   Advanced Search

 

  1. Log files
  2. System Display and Search Facility
  3. General approach
  4. Trace security
  5. CSIv2 CORBA minor codes

See also:

  1. Errors and access problems after enabling security
  2. Errors after enabling SSL, or SSL-related error messages
  3. Errors trying to configure and enable security
  4. Enable global security
  5. Get started with security

 

Log files

When troubleshooting the security component, browse the JVM logs for the server that hosts the resource we are trying to access.

The following is a sample of messages you would expect to see from a server in which the security service has started successfully:

SASRas        A CWWSA0001I: Security configuration initialized.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0002I: Authentication protocol: CSIV2/IBM  SASRas        
A CWWSA0003I: 
Authentication mechanism: SWAM  SASRas        
A CWWSA0004I: Principal name: MYHOSTNAME/aServerID  SASRas        
A CWWSA0005I: SecurityCurrent registered.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0006I: Security connection interceptor initialized.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0007I: Client request interceptor registered.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0008I: Server request interceptor registered.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0009I: IOR interceptor registered.  NameServerImp I CWNMS0720I: Do Security service listener registration.  SecurityCompo 
A CWSCJ0242A: Security service is starting  UserRegistryI 
A CWSCJ0136I: Custom Registry:com.ibm.ws.security.registry.nt. NTLocalDomainRegistryImpl has been initialized  SecurityCompo 
A CWSCJ0202A: 
Admin application initialized successfully  SecurityCompo 
A CWSCJ0203A: Naming application initialized successfully  SecurityCompo 
A CWSCJ0204A: Rolebased authorizer initialized successfully  SecurityCompo 
A CWSCJ0205A: Security 
Admin mBean registered successfully  SecurityCompo 
A CWSCJ0243A: Security service started successfully  SecurityCompo 
A CWSCJ0210A: Security enabled true 

The following is an example of messages from a server which cannot start the security service, in this case because the administrative user ID and password given to communicate with the user registry is wrong, or the user registry itself is down or misconfigured:

SASRas        
A CWWSA0001I: Security configuration initialized.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0002I: Authentication protocol: CSIV2/IBM  SASRas        
A CWWSA0003I: 
Authentication mechanism: SWAM  SASRas        
A CWWSA0004I: Principal name: MYHOSTNAME/aServerID  SASRas        
A CWWSA0005I: SecurityCurrent registered.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0006I: Security connection interceptor initialized.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0007I: Client request interceptor registered.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0008I: Server request interceptor registered.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0009I: IOR interceptor registered.  NameServerImp I CWNMS0720I: Do Security service listener registration. 

SecurityCompo A CWSCJ0242A: Security service is starting UserRegistryI A CWSCJ0136I: Custom Registry:com.ibm.ws.security. registry.nt.NTLocalDomainRegistryImpl has been initialized Authenticatio E CWSCJ4001E: Login failed for badID/<null> javax.security.auth.login.LoginException: authentication failed: bad user/password

The following is an example of messages from a server for which LDAP has been specified as the security mechanism, but the LDAP keys have not been properly configured:

SASRas        
A CWWSA0001I: Security configuration initialized.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0002I: Authentication protocol: CSIV2/IBM  SASRas        
A CWWSA0003I: 
Authentication mechanism: LTPA  SASRas        
A CWWSA0004I: Principal name: MYHOSTNAME/anID  SASRas        
A CWWSA0005I: SecurityCurrent registered.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0006I: Security connection interceptor initialized.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0007I: Client request interceptor registered.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0008I: Server request interceptor registered.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0009I: IOR interceptor registered.  NameServerImp I CWNMS0720I: Do Security service listener registration.  SecurityCompo 
A CWSCJ0242A: Security service is starting  UserRegistryI 
A CWSCJ0136I: Custom Registry:com.ibm.ws.security.registry.nt. NTLocalDomainRegistryImpl has been initialized  SecurityServe E CWSCJ0237E: 
One or more vital LTPAServerObject configuration  attributes are null or not available. 
The attributes and values are password :  LTPA password does exist, 
expiration time 30, 
private key <null>, public key <null>,  and shared key <null>.

A problem with the SSL configuration might lead to the following message. Verify the keystore location and keystore passwords are valid.

Also, ensure the keystore has a valid personal certificate and that the personal certificate public key or certificate authority (CA) root has been extracted on put into the truststore.

SASRas        
A CWWSA0001I: Security configuration initialized.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0002I: Authentication protocol: CSIV2/IBM  SASRas        
A CWWSA0003I: 
Authentication mechanism: SWAM  SASRas        
A CWWSA0004I: Principal name: MYHOSTNAME/aServerId  SASRas        
A CWWSA0005I: SecurityCurrent registered.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0006I: Security connection interceptor initialized.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0007I: Client request interceptor registered.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0008I: Server request interceptor registered.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0009I: IOR interceptor registered.  SASRas        E CWWSA0026E: [SecurityTaggedComponentAssistorImpl.register]  
Exception connecting object to the ORB.  
Check the SSL configuration to ensure
 that the SSL keyStore and trustStore properties are set properly.  
If the problem  persists, contact support for assistance. 
org.omg.CORBA.OBJ_ADAPTER:  ORB_CONNECT_ERROR (5) - couldn't get Server Subcontract  minor code: 4942FB8F  
completed: No 


 

System Display and Search Facility

When troubleshooting the security component, use System Display and Search Facility (SDSF) to browse logs for the server that hosts the resource we are trying to access.

The following sample of messages helps you see from a server in which the security service has started successfully:

 +BBOM0001I com_ibm_authMechanisms_type_OID: No OID for this mechanism.
 +BBOM0001I com_ibm_security_SAF_unauthenticated: WSGUEST.
 +BBOM0001I com_ibm_security_SAF_EJBROLE_Audit_Messages_Suppress: 0.
 +BBOM0001I com_ibm_ws_logging_zos_errorlog_format_cbe: NOT SET, 280

DEFAULT=0. +BBOM0001I com_ibm_CSI_performClientAuthenticationRequired: 0. +BBOM0001I com_ibm_CSI_performClientAuthenticationSupported: 1. +BBOM0001I com_ibm_CSI_performTransportAssocSSLTLSRequired: 0. +BBOM0001I com_ibm_CSI_performTransportAssocSSLTLSSupported: 1. +BBOM0001I com_ibm_CSI_rmiInboundPropagationEnabled: 1. +BBOM0001I com_ibm_CSI_rmiOutboundLoginEnabled: 0. +BBOM0001I com_ibm_CSI_rmiOutboundPropagationEnabled: 1. +BBOM0001I security_assertedID_IBM_accepted: 0. +BBOM0001I security_assertedID_IBM_sent: 0. +BBOM0001I security_disable_daemon_ssl: NOT SET, DEFAULT=0. +BBOM0001I security_sslClientCerts_allowed: 0. +BBOM0001I security_sslKeyring: NOT SET. +BBOM0001I security_zOS_domainName: NOT SET. +BBOM0001I security_zOS_domainType: 0. +BBOM0001I security_zSAS_ssl_repertoire: SY1/DefaultIIOPSSL. +BBOM0001I security_EnableRunAsIdentity: 0. +BBOM0001I security_EnableSyncToOSThread: 0. +BBOM0001I server_configured_system_name: SY1. +BBOM0001I server_generic_short_name: BBOC001. +BBOM0001I server_generic_uuid: 457 *** Message beginning with BBOO0222I apply to Java within *** *** WAS Security *** +BBOO0222I: SECJ6004I: Security Auditing is disabled. +BBOO0222I: SECJ0215I: Successfully set JAAS login provider 631 configuration class to com.ibm.ws.security.auth.login.Configuration. +BBOO0222I: SECJ0136I: Custom 632

Registry:com.ibm.ws.security.registry.zOS.SAFRegistryImpl has been initialized +BBOO0222I: SECJ0157I: Loaded Vendor AuthorizationTable: 633 com.ibm.ws.security.core.SAFAuthorizationTableImpl

 

General approach for troubleshooting security-related issues

When troubleshooting security-related problems, the following questions are very helpful:

Does the problem occur when security is disabled?

This question is a good litmus test to determine that a problem is security related. However, just because a problem only occurs when security is enabled does not always make it a security problem.

More troubleshooting is necessary to ensure the problem is really security-related.

Did security seem to initialize properly?

A lot of security code is visited during initialization. So we can see problems there first if the problem is configuration related.

The following sequence of messages that are generated in the SystemOut.log indicate normal code initialization of an appserver. This sequence varies based on the configuration, but the messages are similar:

SASRas        
A CWWSA0001I: Security configuration initialized.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0002I: Authentication protocol: CSIV2/IBM  SASRas        
A CWWSA0003I: 
Authentication mechanism: SWAM  SASRas        
A CWWSA0004I: Principal name: BIRKT20/pbirk  SASRas        
A CWWSA0005I: SecurityCurrent registered.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0006I: Security connection interceptor initialized.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0007I: Client request interceptor registered.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0008I: Server request interceptor registered.  SASRas        
A CWWSA0009I: IOR interceptor registered.  NameServerImp I CWNMS0720I: Do Security service listener registration.  SecurityCompo 
A CWSCJ0242A: Security service is starting  UserRegistryI 
A CWSCJ0136I: Custom Registry:com.ibm.ws.security.registry.nt. NTLocalDomainRegistryImpl has been initialized  SecurityCompo 
A CWSCJ0202A: 
Admin application initialized successfully  SecurityCompo 
A CWSCJ0203A: Naming application initialized successfully  SecurityCompo 
A CWSCJ0204A: Rolebased authorizer initialized successfully  SecurityCompo 
A CWSCJ0205A: Security 
Admin mBean registered successfully  SecurityCompo 
A CWSCJ0243A: Security service started successfully 

SecurityCompo A CWSCJ0210A: Security enabled true

The following sequence of messages generated in the SDSF active log indicate normal code initialization of an appserver. Non-security messages have been removed from the sequence that follows. This sequence will vary based on the configuration, but the messages are similar:

 Trace: 2005/05/06 17:27:31.539 01 t=8E96E0 c=UNK key=P8 (13007002)
   ThreadId: 0000000a 
   FunctionName: printProperties 
   SourceId: com.ibm.ws390.orb.CommonBridge
   Category: 
AUDIT
   ExtendedMessage: BBOJ0077I java.security.policy = 
          /WebSphere/V6R1M0/AppServer/profiles/default/pr

Trace: 2005/05/06 17:27:31.779 01 t=8E96E0 c=UNK key=P8 (13007002) ThreadId: 0000000a FunctionName: printProperties SourceId: com.ibm.ws390.orb.CommonBridge Category: AUDIT ExtendedMessage: BBOJ0077I java.security.auth.login.config = /WebSphere/V6R1M0/AppServer/profiles/default/pr

Trace: 2005/05/06 17:27:40.892 01 t=8E96E0 c=UNK key=P8 (13007002) ThreadId: 0000000a FunctionName: com.ibm.ws.security.core.SecurityDM SourceId: com.ibm.ws.security.core.SecurityDM Category: INFO ExtendedMessage: BBOO0222I: SECJ0231I: The Security component's FFDC Diagnostic Module com.ibm.ws.security.core.Secur red successfully: true.

Trace: 2005/05/06 17:27:40.892 01 t=8E96E0 c=UNK key=P8 (0000000A) Description: Log Boss/390 Error from filename: ./bborjtr.cpp at line: 932 error message: BBOO0222I: SECJ0231I: The Security component's FFDC Diagnostic Module com.ibm.ws.security.core.Securit d successfully: true.

Trace: 2005/05/06 17:27:41.054 01 t=8E96E0 c=UNK key=P8 (13007002) ThreadId: 0000000a FunctionName: com.ibm.ws.security.audit.AuditServiceImpl SourceId: com.ibm.ws.security.audit.AuditServiceImpl Category: AUDIT ExtendedMessage: BBOO0222I: SECJ6004I: Security Auditing is disabled.

Trace: 2005/05/06 17:27:41.282 01 t=8E96E0 c=UNK key=P8 (13007002) ThreadId: 0000000a FunctionName: com.ibm.ws.security.core.distSecurityComponentImpl SourceId: com.ibm.ws.security.core.distSecurityComponentImpl Category: INFO ExtendedMessage: BBOO0222I: SECJ0309I: Java 2 Security is disabled.

Trace: 2005/05/06 17:27:41.282 01 t=8E96E0 c=UNK key=P8 (0000000A) Description: Log Boss/390 Error from filename: ./bborjtr.cpp at line: 932 error message: BBOO0222I: SECJ0309I: Java 2 Security is disabled.

Trace: 2005/05/06 17:27:42.239 01 t=8E96E0 c=UNK key=P8 (13007002) ThreadId: 0000000a FunctionName: com.ibm.ws.security.auth.login.Configuration SourceId: com.ibm.ws.security.auth.login.Configuration Category: AUDIT ExtendedMessage: BBOO0222I: SECJ0215I: Successfully set JAAS login provider configuration class to com.ibm.ws.securit

Configuration.

Trace: 2005/05/06 17:27:42.253 01 t=8E96E0 c=UNK key=P8 (13007002) ThreadId: 0000000a FunctionName: com.ibm.ws.security.core.distSecurityComponentImpl SourceId: com.ibm.ws.security.core.distSecurityComponentImpl Category: INFO ExtendedMessage: BBOO0222I: SECJ0212I: WCCM JAAS configuration information successfully pushed to login provider clas

Trace: 2005/05/06 17:27:42.254 01 t=8E96E0 c=UNK key=P8 (0000000A) Description: Log Boss/390 Error from filename: ./bborjtr.cpp at line: 932 error message: BBOO0222I: SECJ0212I: WCCM JAAS configuration information successfully pushed to login provider class.

Trace: 2005/05/06 17:27:42.306 01 t=8E96E0 c=UNK key=P8 (13007002) ThreadId: 0000000a FunctionName: com.ibm.ws.security.core.distSecurityComponentImpl SourceId: com.ibm.ws.security.core.distSecurityComponentImpl Category: INFO ExtendedMessage: BBOO0222I: SECJ0240I: Security service initialization completed successfully

Trace: 2005/05/06 17:27:42.306 01 t=8E96E0 c=UNK key=P8 (0000000A) Description: Log Boss/390 Error from filename: ./bborjtr.cpp at line: 932 error message: BBOO0222I: SECJ0240I: Security service initialization completed successfully

Trace: 2005/05/06 17:27:42.952 01 t=8E96E0 c=UNK key=P8 (13007002) ThreadId: 0000000a FunctionName: com.ibm.ws.objectpool.ObjectPoolService SourceId: com.ibm.ws.objectpool.ObjectPoolService Category: INFO ExtendedMessage: BBOO0222I: OBPL0007I: Object Pool Manager service is disabled.

Trace: 2005/05/06 17:27:53.512 01 t=8E96E0 c=UNK key=P8 (13007002) ThreadId: 0000000a FunctionName: com.ibm.ws.security.registry.UserRegistryImpl SourceId: com.ibm.ws.security.registry.UserRegistryImpl Category: AUDIT ExtendedMessage: BBOO0222I: SECJ0136I: Custom Registry:com.ibm.ws.security.registry.zOS.SAFRegistryImpl has been init

Trace: 2005/05/06 17:27:55.229 01 t=8E96E0 c=UNK key=P8 (13007002) ThreadId: 0000000a FunctionName: com.ibm.ws.security.role.PluggableAuthorizationTableProxy SourceId: com.ibm.ws.security.role.PluggableAuthorizationTableProxy Category: AUDIT ExtendedMessage: BBOO0222I: SECJ0157I: Loaded Vendor AuthorizationTable: com.ibm.ws.security.core.SAFAuthorizationTab

Trace: 2005/05/06 17:27:56.481 01 t=8E96E0 c=UNK key=P8 (13007002) ThreadId: 0000000a FunctionName: com.ibm.ws.security.core.distSecurityComponentImpl SourceId: com.ibm.ws.security.core.distSecurityComponentImpl Category: INFO ExtendedMessage: BBOO0222I: SECJ0243I: Security service started successfully

Trace: 2005/05/06 17:27:56.481 01 t=8E96E0 c=UNK key=P8 (0000000A) Description: Log Boss/390 Error from filename: ./bborjtr.cpp at line: 932 error message: BBOO0222I: SECJ0243I: Security service started successfully

Trace: 2005/05/06 17:27:56.482 01 t=8E96E0 c=UNK key=P8 (13007002) ThreadId: 0000000a FunctionName: com.ibm.ws.security.core.distSecurityComponentImpl SourceId: com.ibm.ws.security.core.distSecurityComponentImpl Category: INFO ExtendedMessage: BBOO0222I: SECJ0210I: Security enabled true

Trace: 2005/05/06 17:27:56.483 01 t=8E96E0 c=UNK key=P8 (0000000A) Description: Log Boss/390 Error from filename: ./bborjtr.cpp at line: 932 error message: BBOO0222I: SECJ0210I: Security enabled true

Is there a stack trace or exception printed in the system log file?

A single stack trace tells a lot about the problem. What code initiated the code that failed? What is the failing component? Which class did the failure actually come from? Sometimes the stack trace is all that is needed to solve the problem and it can pinpoint the root cause. Other times, it can only give us a clue, and can actually be misleading. When support analyzes a stack trace, they can request additional trace if it is not clear what the problem is. If it seems to be security-related and the solution cannot be determined from the stack trace or problem description, we are asked to gather the following trace specification:

SASRas=all=enabled:com.ibm.ws.security.*=all=enabled

...from all processes involved.

Is this a distributed security problem or a local security problem?

  • If the problem is local, that is the code involved does not make a remote method invocation, then troubleshooting is isolated to a single process. It is important to know when a problem is local versus distributed because the behavior of the ORB, among other components, is different between the two. When a remote method invocation takes place, an entirely different security code path is entered.

  • When you know that the problem involves two or more servers, the techniques of troubleshooting change. we need to trace all the servers involved simultaneously so that the trace shows the client and server sides of the problem. Make sure the timestamps on all machines match as closely as possible so that we can find the request and reply pair from two different processes. Enable both SAS or z/SAS and Security trace using the trace specification:

    SASRas=all=enabled:com.ibm.ws.security.*=all=enabled

Is the problem related to authentication or authorization?

Most security problems fall under one of these two categories.

Authentication is the process of determining who the caller is.

Authorization is the process of validating that the caller has the proper authority to invoke the requested method. When authentication fails, typically this failure is related to either the authentication protocol, authentication mechanism or user registry. When authorization fails, this is usually related to the application bindings from assembly and deployment and to the caller's identity who is accessing the method and the roles that are required by the method.

Is this a Web or EJB request?

Web requests have a completely different code path than EJB requests. Different security features exist for Web requests than for EJB requests, requiring a completely different body of knowledge to resolve. For example, when using the LTPA authentication mechanism, the SSO is available for Web requests but not for EJB requests. Web requests involve HTTP header information not required by EJB requests due to the protocol differences.

Also, the Web container or servlet engine is involved in the entire process. Any of these components can be involved in the problem and all require consideration during troubleshooting, based on the type of request and where the failure occurs.

Secure EJB requests heavily involve the ORB and Naming components since they flow over the RMI/IIOP protocol. In addition, when Workload Manager (WLM) is enabled, other behavior changes in the code can be observed. All of these components interact closely for security to work properly in this environment. At times, trace in any or all of these components might be necessary to troubleshoot problems in this area.

The trace specification to begin with is...

SASRas=all=enabled:com.ibm.ws.security.*=all=enabled

ORB trace is also very beneficial when the SAS/Security trace does not seem to pinpoint the problem.

Does the problem seem to be related to the SSL?

SSL is a totally distinct separate layer of security. Troubleshooting SSL problems is usually separate from troubleshooting authentication and authorization problems, and we have many considerations. Usually, SSL problems are first-time setup problems because the configuration can be difficult. Each client must contain the signer certificate of the server. During mutual authentication, each server must contain the client's signer certificate. Also, there can be protocol differences (SSLv3 vs. TLS), and listener port problems related to stale Interoperable Object References (IORs), that is IORs from a server, that reflect the port prior to the server restarting.

For SSL problems, sometimes you get a request for an SSL trace to determine what is happening with the SSL handshake. The SSL handshake is the process that occurs when a client opens a socket to a server. If anything goes wrong with the key exchange, cipher exchange, and so on, the handshake fails and the socket is not valid.

Tracing JSSE (the SSL implementation used in WAS) involves the following steps:

  • Set the following system property on the client and server processes:

    -Djavax.net.debug=true

    For the server, add the system property to the Generic JVM Arguments property of the Java virtual machine settings page.

  • Turn on ORB trace as well.

  • Recreate the problem.

    The SystemOut.log of both processes contain the JSSE trace. We can find trace similar to the following example:

    SSLConnection: install <com.ibm.sslite.e@3ae78375> 
    >> handleHandshakeV2 <com.ibm.sslite.e@3ae78375> 
    >> handshakeV2 type = 1 
    >> clientHello: SSLv2.  SSL client version: 3.0 
    ... 
    ... 
    ...  JSSEContext: handleSession[Socket[addr=null,port=0,localport=0]] 
    
    << sendServerHello. SSL version: 3.0  SSL_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5  HelloRandom 
    ... 
    ... 
    ... 
    << sendCertificate. 
    << sendServerHelloDone. 
    >> handleData <com.ibm.sslite.e@3ae78375> 
    >> handleHandshake <com.ibm.sslite.e@3ae78375> 
    >> handshakeV3 type = 16 
    
    >> clientKeyExchange. 
    >> handleData <com.ibm.sslite.e@3ae78375> 
    >> handleChangeCipherSpec <com.ibm.sslite.e@3ae78375> 
    >> handleData <com.ibm.sslite.e@3ae78375> 
    >> handleHandshake <com.ibm.sslite.e@3ae78375> 
    >> handshakeV3 type = 20 
    >> finished. 
    << sendChangeCipherSpec. 
    << sendFinished. 
    
    

 

Trace security

The classes that implement WAS security are:

To view detailed information on the run time behavior of security, enable trace on the following components and review the output:

Fine tuning SAS traces:

If a subset of classes need to be traced for the SAS/CSIv2 component, a system property can be specified with the class names comma separated:

com.ibm.CORBA.securityTraceFilter=SecurityConnectionInterceptorImpl, VaultImpl, ...

Fine tuning Security traces:

If a subset of packages need to be traced, specify a trace specification more detailed than

com.ibm.ws.security.*=all=enabled

For example, to trace just dynamic policy code, we can specify

com.ibm.ws.security.policy.*=all=enabled

To disable dynamic policy trace, we can specify com.ibm.ws.security.policy.*=all=disabled.

Set CSIv2, or SAS Trace Settings

Enable Client-Side CSIv2 and SAS Trace

To enable CSIv2 and SAS trace on a pure client...

  • Edit the file TraceSettings.properties in...

    /WebSphere/AppServer/properties

  • In this file, change traceFileName= to point to the path in which you want the ouput file created. Make sure you put a double backslash (\\) between each subdirectory. For example...

    traceFileName=c:\\WebSphere\\AppServer\\logs\\sas_client.log

  • In this file, add the trace spec string:

    SASRas=all=enabled

    Any additional trace strings can be added on separate lines.

  • Point to this file from within the client application. On the Java command line where you launch the client, add the following system property:

    -DtraceSettingsFile=TraceSettings.properties

    Do not give the fully qualified path to the TraceSettings.properties file.

    Make sure that the TraceSettings.properties file is in the class path.

Enable Server-Side CSIv2 and SAS Trace

To enable SAS trace in an appserver...

  • Add the trace specification...

    SASRas=all=enabled

    to server.xml or add it to the Trace settings within the WebConsole GUI.

  • Typically it is best to also trace the authorization security runtime in addition to the authentication protocol runtime. To do this, use the following two trace specifications in combination:

    SASRas=all=enabled:com.ibm.ws.security.*=all=enabled

  • When troubleshooting a connection type problem, it is beneficial to trace both CSIv2 and SAS or CSIv2 and z/SAS and the ORB. To do this, use the following three trace specifications:

    SASRas=all=enabled:com.ibm.ws.security.*=all=enabled:ORBRas=all=enabled.

  • In addition to adding these trace specifications, for ORB trace there are a couple of system properties that also need to be set.

    Go to the ORB settings in the GUI and add the following two properties:

    com.ibm.CORBA.Debug=true
    com.ibm.CORBA.CommTrace=true

 

CSIv2 CORBA minor codes

Whenever exceptions occur within the security code on either the client or server, the eventual exception becomes a CORBA exception. Any exception that occurs gets embedded in a CORBA exception because the CORBA architecture is used by the security service for its own inter-process communication. CORBA exceptions are generic and indicate a problem in communication between two components. CORBA minor codes are more specific and indicate the underlying reason that a component could not complete a request.

The following shows the CORBA minor codes that a client can expect to receive after running a security-related request such as authentication. It also includes the CORBA exception type that the minor code appears in.

The following exception shows an example of a CORBA exception where the minor code is 49424300 and indicates Authentication Failure. Typically, a descriptive message is also included in the exception to assist in troubleshooting the problem. Here, the detailed message is:

Exception caught invoking authenticateBasicAuthData from SecurityServer for user jdoe. Reason: com.ibm.WebSphereSecurity.AuthenticationFailedException" which indicates that the authentication failed for user jdoe.

The completed field in the exception indicates whether the method was completed or not. In the case of a NO_PERMISSION, never invoke the message; therefore it is always completed:No. Other exceptions that are caught on the server side can have a completed status of "Maybe" or "Yes".

org.omg.CORBA.NO_PERMISSION: Caught WSSecurityContextException in  WSSecurityContext.acceptSecContext(),  
reason: Major Code[0] Minor Code[0] Message[Exception caught invoking  authenticateBasicAuthData from SecurityServer for user jdoe.  
Reason:  com.ibm.WebSphereSecurity.AuthenticationFailedException]  minor code: 49424300  completed: No 
 at com.ibm.ISecurityLocalObjectBaseL13Impl.PrincipalAuthFailReason. map_auth_fail_to_minor_code(PrincipalAuthFailReason.java:83) 
        at com.ibm.ISecurityLocalObjectBaseL13Impl.CSIServerRI.receive_request
               (CSIServerRI.java:1569) 
        at com.ibm.rmi.pi.InterceptorManager.iterateReceiveRequest
              (InterceptorManager.java:739) 
        at com.ibm.CORBA.iiop.ServerDelegate.dispatch(ServerDelegate.java:398) 
        at com.ibm.rmi.iiop.ORB.process(ORB.java:313) 
        at com.ibm.CORBA.iiop.ORB.process(ORB.java:1581) 
        at com.ibm.rmi.iiop.GIOPConnection.doWork(GIOPConnection.java:1827) 
        at com.ibm.rmi.iiop.WorkUnitImpl.doWork(WorkUnitImpl.java:81) 
        at com.ibm.ejs.oa.pool.PooledThread.run(ThreadPool.java:91) 
        at com.ibm.ws.util.CachedThread.run(ThreadPool.java:149) 


Minor code name Minor code value (in hex) Exception type (all in the package of org.omg.CORBA .*) Minor code description Retry performed (when authenticationRetryEnabled = true)
AuthenticationFailed 49424300 NO_PERMISSION This code is a generic authentication failed error. It does not give any details about whether or not the user ID or password is valid. Some user registries can choose to use this type of error code, others can choose to use the next three types that are more specific. Yes
InterceptLocateException 494210B8 INTERNAL Problem when processing an incoming locate request. No
InvalidUserid 49424301 NO_PERMISSION This code occurs when the registry returns bad user ID. Yes
InvalidPassword 49424302 NO_PERMISSION This code occurs when the registry returns a bad password. Yes
InvalidSecurityCredentials 49424303 NO_PERMISSION This is a generic error indicating that the credentials are bad for some reason. It might be that the right attributes are not set. Yes, if client has BasicAuth credential (token based credential was rejected in the first place).
InvalidRealm 49424304 NO_PERMISSION This code occurs when the REALM in the token received from the client does not match the server's current realm. No
ValidationFailed 49424305 NO_PERMISSION A validation failure occurs when a token is sent from the client or server to a target server but the token format or the expiration is not valid. Yes, if client has BasicAuth credential (token based credential was rejected in the first place).
CredentialTokenExpired 49424306 NO_PERMISSION This code is more specific about why the validation failed. In this case, the token has an absolute lifetime and the lifetime has expired. Therefore, it is no longer a valid token and cannot be used. Yes, if client has BasicAuth credential (token based credential was rejected in the first place).
InvalidCredentialToken 49424307 NO_PERMISSION This is more specific about why the validation failed. In this case, the token cannot be decrypted or the data within the token is not readable. Yes, if client has BasicAuth credential (token based credential was rejected in the first place).
SessionDoesNotExist 49424308 NO_PERMISSION CSIv2 session does not exist on the server. Typically, a retry occurs automatically and successfully creates a new session. Yes
SessionConflictingEvidence 49424309 NO_PERMISSION A session already exists on the server that matches the context_id sent over by the client. However, the information provided by the client for this EstablishContext message is different from the information originally provided to establish the session. Yes
SessionRejected 4942430A NO_PERMISSION The session referenced by the client has been previously rejected by the server. Yes
SecurityServerNotAvailable 4942430B NO_PERMISSION The server cannot contact the local or remote security server in order to authenticate or validate. No
InvalidIdentityToken 4942430C NO_PERMISSION Identity cannot be obtained from the identity token when Identity Assertion is enabled. No
IdentityServerNotTrusted 4942430D NO_PERMISSION The server ID of the sending server is not on the target server's trusted principal list. No
InvalidMessage 4942430E NO_PERMISSION The CSIv2 message format is not valid for the receiving server. No
AuthenticationNotSupported 49421090 NO_PERMISSION A mechanism does not support authentication (very rare). No
InvalidSecurityMechanism 49421091 NO_PERMISSION The specified security mechanism is not known. No
CredentialNotAvailable 49421092 NO_PERMISSION A credential is not available when it is required. No
SecurityMechanismNotSupported 49421093 NO_PERMISSION A security mechanism specified in the CSIv2 token is not implemented on the server. No
ValidationNotSupported 49421094 NO_PERMISSION A mechanism does not support validation, such as LocalOS. This error does not occur since the LocalOS credential is not a forwardable credential, therefore, validation never needs to be called on this credential. No
CredentialTokenNotSet 49421095 NO_PERMISSION The token inside the credential is null. No
ServerConnectionFailed 494210A0 COMM_FAILURE This error is used when a connection attempt fails. Yes (via ORB retry)
CorbaSystemException 494210B0 INTERNAL This code is a generic CORBA specific exception in system code. No
Java Exception 494210B1 INTERNAL An unexpected Java exception occurred. No
ValueIsNull 494210B2 INTERNAL A value or parameter that passed in is null. No
EffectivePolicyNotPresent 494210B3 INTERNAL An effective policy object for CSIv2 is not present. This object is used to determine what security configuration features are specified. No
NullPointerException 494210B4 INTERNAL A NullPointerException is caught in the runtime. No
ErrorGettingClassInstance 494210B5 INTERNAL Problem loading a class dynamically. No
MalFormedParameters 494210B6 INTERNAL Parameters are not valid. No
DuplicateSecurityAttributeType 494210B7 INTERNAL Duplicate credential attribute specified during the set_attributes operation. No
MethodNotImplemented 494210C0 NO_IMPLEMENT A method invoked is not implemented. No
GSSFormatError 494210C5 BAD_PARAM A Generic Security Services (GSS) encoding or decoding routine has created an exception. No
TagComponentFormatError 494210C6 BAD_PARAM A tag component cannot be read properly. No
InvalidSecurityAttributeType 494210C7 BAD_PARAM An attribute type specified during the set_attributes operation is not a valid type. No
SecurityConfigError 494210CA INITIALIZE A problem exists between the client and server configuration. No

For current information available from IBM Support on known problems and their resolution, see the IBM Support page.

IBM Support has documents that can save you time gathering information needed to resolve this problem. Before opening a PMR, see the IBM Support page.



 

Related concepts

Troubleshooting help from IBM

 

Related tasks

Troubleshooting security configurations

 

Related

Object Request Broker service settings
Diagnose and fix problems: Links
Tracing and logging configuration