Description of Personalization filtering, and examples of when to use a filtering type.
There are three types of Personalization:
This approach has the advantage of driving the site's behavior with the business objectives of the site owner. The site owner is usually the owner of a marketing campaign or some other business manager.
When complex filtering is required, a rule-based system may work better than collaborative filtering, and vice versa. The following table details examples where one type of personalization is better than the other.
Scenario | Which filtering type to use | Reason |
---|---|---|
If the number of items offered and users who purchase them are rather low. | Rules | Very little room to compute user similarity necessary for collaborative filtering. |
If price points are high or purchasing frequency is low. | Rules | Finite, limited arenas - collaborative filtering fails because of the inherent lack of diversity. |
If there is a pre-existing dependency between items. Example: Disability policy required for homeowner | Rules | Recommending a disability policy just because collaborative filtering says many others "like this user" also bought a policy is incorrect--one must have the homeowner policy first. |
If number of items offered and users who purchase them are rather high. | Collaborative | Cannot write rules covering all items. |
If price points are low, all quite dissimilar, or the products offered have a wide range of user appeal. | Collaborative | The wide variance fits the collaborative filtering approach. Collaborative filtering also lowers the risk of making "bad" recommendations. |
When not much information is gathered about the user, but the user can be identified, possibly by a login or cookie. | Collaborative | In this case, user attributes on which to base rules may be lacking. Collaborative filtering can compare the user's experiences on the site to other users. |
Home |